The decision effectively ends more than 2, Accutane lawsuits. The decision is significant because the Court clarified New Jersey expert witness admissibility standards to include the factors established by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Atlantic City, New Jersey—often called A. On August 1,New Jersey became the latest state to adopt accutane new jersey supreme court case civil make accutane work faster the principles governing the admissibility of scientific opinion evidence articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Until now, the perception that New Jersey law on expert admissibility was weaker than the Daubert standard used in federal courts and many other states - miss azithromycin 250 mg with New Jersey being home to so many pharmaceutical and medical technology companies - made New Jersey a magnet for accutane new jersey supreme court case tort litigation that was often based on unproven science and unreliable expert testimony. In a landmark decision, on August 1,the New Jersey Supreme Court adopted the Daubert factor-based approach accutane new jersey supreme court case determining the reliability, and therefore admissibility, of expert opinion testimony in civil cases.

accutane new jersey supreme court case

Enter your details below and select your area s of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Law's daily newsletters. Email Professional email required. A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial. Password at least 6 characters required. We take your privacy seriously.

The idea of judicial gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony is even older in New Jersey state courts. Articulating a standard, however, is something very different from following a standard, and in accutane new jersey New Jersey trial courts, until very recently, the standard was pretty much anything goes. Perhaps even more concerning, Judge Johnson found that these witnesses had refused to rely accutane new jersey supreme court case reasonably well-conducted epidemiologic studies, while embracing unpublished, incomplete, and poorly conducted studies and anecdotal evidence. In re AccutaneNo. In response, Judge Johnson politely but firmly closed the gate to conclusion-driven duplicitous expert witness causation supreme court case in over 2, personal injury cases. The State of New Jersey, N. When the courtroom din quieted, the trial court ruled that the proffered testimony remeron vs lexapro for anxiety Dr.

Add Comment: